Pickslanting Primer Update! Pick Design & Function

By June 1, 2019Lessons

One of our top priorities this year is improving our intro tutorial material to cover even more fundamentals of guitar picking and technique. To that end, the Pickslanting Primer now has an awesome introduction to the tools we as players use most intimately: guitar picks!

Plectrum Complexity

If you consider just the topics of pick choice and pick grip together, you’ll encounter an overall level of technical complexity that practically rivals instrument technique itself. This is especially true compared to more technologically advanced instruments like keyboards, which do much more of the actual tone production work for you.

In fact, when it comes to the sheer mechanical variety of ways to tune and pluck guitar, and the general level of voodoo that great players need to learn before even playing a single note, the guitar is maybe most similar to the drums. Just ask a handful of great drum techs what they do with the bottom head on a snare or a tom, and you’ll get a different answer from each of them. They’ll all be right, and they’ll all sound great! And don’t even get us started on head material, coatings, shell wood, paint, wraps, damping, venting, and…

You can’t have just one. You can’t!

In short, picks are one of your most important pieces of gear, there’s just so much weird mechanical stuff going on, that we thought it fitting that the definitive instructional product on their use should have a suitable introductions to them. Not only that, but we wanted that introduction to be accessible to both experienced and new players alike, since we count both among our viewers.

Across ten chapters and two hours of guitar pick history, tests, and analysis, we take a look at the most common pick designs to understand their effects on playability and sound. This includes getting to the bottom of what attributes like thickness, point geometry, edge geometry, taper, and material choice have on tone and dynamics. Along the way, we’ll ask some fundamental questions about the deceptively complex interaction that happens when you actually try to play a note with a pick.

Going Full Code

We’ve been working on this one all year, and frankly it was a f**k ton of work. Way, way more than we anticipated when we thought, hey, our product should, you know, say something about how to choose a guitar pick. Instead, things got out of hand as usual and we gave it the whole Cracking the Code treatment of objective frequency comparisons and musings about the physics of pick and string interaction.

Edge picking is one of the fundamental ways guitar picks control tone, loudness, and smoothness of picking motion.

To that end, one of the interesting things we discovered is that Edge Picking™ is one of the most fundamental effects in guitar pick function. Many differences in pick performance and tone production between pick designs only show up when you introduce and/or change the edge picking you’re using. This includes differences in frequency response due to point geometry, material choice, gauge, and probably other things, all of which are muted to nonexistent when you play picks flatter against the string, with lower-degree edge picking.

For example, the frequency difference that results when you increase or decrease the amount of edge picking you use is the same as the curve that results when you increase or decrease a pick’s gauge while keeping your degree of edge picking constant. They are, in a sense, modulating the same effect on the string, whatever that is!

Edge picking is like an EQ control for your hand!

In our chapter on Edge Picking, we offer some musings on what that might be, including modifying picks to have asymmetrical leading and trailing edges to see what effect this has on the sound. We would like to thank estimable forum user Tommo, an optical physicist by trade, who reviewed our vector math for accuracy and was responsible for clarifying our analogy with billiards balls — which we nixed, grazie mille! — and straightening out our use of loaded terms like force, momentum, and energy. Hopefully we got it all right.

Primed for Picking

The long and the short of it is that our core instructional product is rapidly becoming (if it isn’t already) the most comprehensive introduction around to picks and picking technique for new and experienced players alike. It now has a proper introduction to the principal tools of the trade. And we’re glad to have finished it.

If you’re an experienced player, we’ve attempted to put some practical tests behind observations you may have already made and perhaps a few you haven’t. The results of our investigations aren’t always what we expected.  That’s why we learned a ton in the process of conducting them.

If you’re new to picking technique, what we’d like to give you is the kind of perspective that experienced players have about picks and how they work, so that you don’t have to spend the next few decades trying them all — even though you might just do that anyway!

If Pick Design and Function sounds like something you’d enjoy, you can watch the new material right here!

Top Comments

  1. Avatar for Troy Troy says:

    We’ve been working on this one all year, and frankly it was a f**k ton of work. Way, way more than we anticipated when we thought, hey, our product should, you know, say something about how to choose a guitar pick. Instead, things got out of hand as usual and we gave it the whole Cracking the Code treatment of objective frequency comparisons and musings about the physics of pick and string interaction.

    To that end, some of the interesting things we discovered is that Edge Picking™ is one of the fundamental effects in guitar pick function. Many differences in pick performance and tone production between pick designs only show up when you introduce and/or change the edge picking you’re using. This includes differences in frequency response due to point geometry, material choice, gauge, and probably other things, all of which are muted to nonexistent when you play picks flatter against the string, with lower-degree edge picking.

    For example, the frequency difference that results when you increase or decrease the amount of edge picking you use is the same as the curve that results when you increase or decrease a pick’s gauge while keeping your degree of edge picking constant. They are, in a sense, modulating the same effect on the string, whatever that is! In our chapter on Edge Picking, we offer some musings on what that might be, including modifying picks to have asymmetrical leading and trailing edges to see what effect this has on the sound. We would like to thank the estimable @tommo, who reviewed our vector math for accuracy and was responsible for clarifying our analogy with billiards balls — which we nixed, grazie mille! — and straightening out our use of loaded terms like force, momentum, and energy. Hopefully we got it all right.

    The long and the short of it is that our core instructional product is rapidly becoming (if it isn’t already) the most comprehensive introduction around to picks and picking technique for new and experienced players alike. It now has a proper introduction to the principal tools of the trade. And we’re glad to have finished it.

  2. ok so here you are essentially talking about the tone of the picked note? if u say “frequency” we might start to think of the actual pitch??

    makes me think of this from Y.R.O. where Paul is going along playing the perpetual motion piece and it has a fuller tone and then he hits the lick at 1:38ish and it gets really thin sounding, which is cool

    I used to hear the same “tone change due to obvious pick angle change” thing in some of Troy Stetinas early teaching material

    franky hannon also used to get a sort of signature pick sound, like :40 to :48 here.

    Whatever it is Ive never had that lol. for years i used Tortex yellow which I suppose to too smoothish to get this type of abrasive scratchiness?? im currently using Jazz3XL which seems pretty smooth to…for instance I cant get a decent pickscrape sound

  3. Avatar for Troy Troy says:

    Yes, sorry, by frequency response I mean what guitar players will casually call “tone”: the range of harmonics present in the resulting note. The video chapters go into explicit detail on this, throwing up the harmonics on a spectrum so you can see exactly what guitar pick “tone” looks like, and what parts of it go up or down when you change picks and edge picking. It should be pretty clear when you watch it. That’s the hope anyway!

  4. yeah, “frequency response” was pretty clear…but that 2nd quote of just “frequency” could be seen as a bit vague. (but I think we know what u meant lol)

  5. Ahem, the correct phrase is ‘technical terms’, :face_with_raised_eyebrow:

    :nerd_face: :winking_face_with_tongue:

Continue the discussion at The Cracking the Code Forum

33 more replies

Participants

Avatar for Brendan Avatar for Troy Avatar for Frylock Avatar for aliendough Avatar for tommo Avatar for GraehmeFloyd Avatar for Groff Avatar for induction Avatar for Drew Avatar for kgk Avatar for shabtronic Avatar for Pat_Pending Avatar for stormymondays Avatar for NTC Avatar for JonJon Avatar for smithguitars Avatar for LuckyMojo Avatar for Pconsoli74